|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |

Dierdra Vaal
Caldari Eve University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.04.26 11:08:00 -
[1]
Originally by: Larkonis Trassler Edited by: Larkonis Trassler on 26/04/2010 10:57:46
Originally by: Nouvelle Noir
Edit: and yes, omg, Ankh will get my damn vote, only to kick all of you trolls in your face!
You should probably educate yourself about Ankh. The fact that she's a carebear doesn't bother anyone, the fact that she's [...] worst of all, Dutch, does
hey!
  Director of Education :: EVE University
CSM1 delegate and CSM3 chairman
|

Dierdra Vaal
Caldari Eve University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.05.07 09:14:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Dierdra Vaal on 07/05/2010 09:14:31 actually all CSM members sign an agreement that explicitly states that being on the CSM does not imply having a job with CCP and that it does not imply that you will be hired in the future.
While being on the CSM is definitely something you could put on your resume, you can't list it as 'Work experience' or phrase it in such a way that it seems CCP was your employer, as that is simply not true.
In fact, employees of CCP are not allowed to be on the CSM: it is a player council, not a dev council. CSM members are not employees by definition. Director of Education :: EVE University
CSM1 delegate and CSM3 chairman
|

Dierdra Vaal
Caldari Eve University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.05.10 08:26:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Stevakis
Originally by: Cpt Branko
Originally by: Stevakis I don't think the stuff posted about her is true.
Eve-search doesn't lie. Hell, you have screenshots of her "evil egg throwers need to get banned" crap in local.
Be rational. Ankh has been on the CSM twice. She hasn't raised any issues to ban PVP or people that gank. The suicide gank issue she raised is balanced. It asks for PVP means to deal with it, all PVE means have this listed as 'con'.
The suicide gank issue was only balanced because CSM1 would only support it if she changed her original, over the top proposal to something more balanced. Her original proposal would've essentially made it impossible for suicide ganking to exist.
So the issue isnt balanced because of her - its balanced because of the other CSM members (in CSM1).
It's fine if you want to vote for Ank - people have different ideas about the game and just because I dont agree with them does not make them inherently invalid. But do make sure you're informed properly. Director of Education :: EVE University
CSM1 delegate and CSM3 chairman
|

Dierdra Vaal
Caldari Eve University Ivy League
|
Posted - 2010.05.20 11:58:00 -
[4]
while the victim isnt at fault for being shot, the victim IS at fault for the measure in which his loss affects him.
If you pack all your belongings in a hauler and get shot, its your fault that you lost everything: you chose to take the risk of putting all your stuff in one easily shot pinata.
A smart player doesn't have to lose much of his total worth at all even if he gets shot. Director of Education :: EVE University
CSM1 delegate and CSM3 chairman
|
|
|
|